Today we’re talking about the 1999 film The Mummy.
Story
A very loose remake of the 1932 movie with Boris Karloff. Its story, although very similar in spirit, is very different.
I liked the symmetry and the balance of horror and humour.
Score: 1
Characters
It’s rare to have two “scaredy” characters in the same movie but they did a great job in deferentiating them. I like the Indiana Jones-style character and the love story was fun. I like the confidence and strength that Evelyn gains through the movie.
Score: 1
Dialogue
The dialogue is impressively funny for such a serious movie. I like the banter between the main characters and between the siblings.
Score: 1
Visuals and Music
What a beautiful movie. The cinematagraphy was stunning while still obviously influenced by classic horror and adventure movies. The CGI looked a little dated, but there wasn’t that much.
The music was beautiful and fit perfectly. I want the soundtrack for my D&D games.
Score: 1
Fun
Seeing the influence of older movies on this one and then the influence this had on future films is so cool. I saw it in theatres when it first came out and loved it, but I appreciated its details more now.
My six year old was nervous throughout, but the three year old loved it. Jen found it scary, but fun (it was her first time watching it).
Fun and exciting for the whole family.
Score: 1
Overall
A classic action adventure with a touch of horror and romance. The characters are great and the movie is absolutely beautiful. A must-watch for anyone who loves archeology or action adventure movies.
Final Score: 5 Stars out of 5*
*A 5 star review doesn’t mean the movie was perfect nor that it is perfect for everyone but it is a movie I believe is as close to perfect as possible.
The movie adheres really closely to the original novel. I’m impressed that they were able to create a world where the book exists and then manage to follow almost exactly the same plot.
I’m impressed at the funeral scene where they spent the time to let the two male characters grieve and cry on camera. It’s not often you see men show emotions.
I like that they made the guide a woman and made her hyper competent, but I could have done without the awkward love story.
Score: 0.5
Journey 2
The movie doesn’t follow the story line of the book but that’s probably a good thing. The code breaking at the beginning and the diverse cast is awesome. I found the movie lagged a little as they traipsed around the island from one set piece to another.
The emotion in this one felt a little stilted compared to the first. The “pecs” talk was awkward until the berry part.
It’s a very linear movie without much surprise.
Score: 0.5
Characters
Journey 1
There are three characters in the movie. The dorky scientist that morphs into an action hero, the scared kid who goes on an adventure, and the beautiful and competent mountain guide with daddy issues. The movie spends very little time on any development for the characters, even forgetting the scientists awkwardness mid-movie in order to have him punching things and ripping off his sleeves. They are static but not offensive or flat.
Score: 0.5
Journey 2
The sullen kid became a sullen teen. The rest of the cast is entertaining if borderline annoying. The Rock infuses his character with enough charisma to make him likeable as does Michael Caine.
Vanessa Hudgens is great but has no real reason to fall for the charmless main hero. Luis Guzmán’s character is absolutely fantastic, funny and relatable.
Score: 0.5
Dialogue
Journey 1
The banter between the three characters ranges from dumb to entertaining. Thankfully there’s a lot more quips than awkward flirting.
Score: 0.5
Journey 2
The dialogue between the love interests is stilted and awkward, hopefully on purpose, same with the dialogue overall. Other than a few good lines it was pretty bad.
Score: 0
Visuals and Music
Journey 1
This movie was designed to be shown in 3D in the height of 3D stupidity. To the point where they added extra gags just for the effect. I hate that. The technology and special effects should always work for the story not the other way around. Despite that, the special effects were passable and the scenery was cool.
The music was utterly forgettable but not bad.
Score: 0.5
Journey 2
The special effects are enhanced and take much too much time from the meagre story. (I sound like a grumpy critic.) It’s pretty, but not great. Again, the 3D for 3D’s sake is tiresome.
The soundtrack is meh, nothing exciting. I enjoyed the songs.
Score: 0.5
Fun
Journey 1
I like the book, I liked the old movie from the 50’s, and I had fun with this one. There’s thrills and adventure throughout along with two very pretty leads. I also enjoyed how much my daughter got into the film and reacted to the young boy’s perils.
Score: 1
Journey 2
I’m not as big a fan of the books this was based on. I liked Treasure Island, hated Gulliver’s Travels, and was indifferent towards Mysterious Island. There were a lot of exciting moments but the fun was in the, rarer, character interactions.
Score: 0.5
Overall
Journey 1
This is a fun, easy, and exciting movie. Not the greatest and maybe a little forgettable but fun to watch.
Final Score: 3 Stars out of 5
Journey 2
There was too much time spent of visual gags and action set pieces when this sort of story is supposed to showcase the characters in between. The action often replaces character development instead of accelerating it.
Overall it was fun, but lacked substance.
Final Score: 2 Stars out of 5
S.M. Carrière and I discussed and reviewed Journey to the Center of the Earth from 1958 on the Night at the Round Table. Have a look here:
The story is riddled with puns, fart jokes, 4th wall breaking, and silly slapstick. Some of that is good, some of that is bad. It’s a story that doesn’t take itself seriously but has some interesting things to say as subtext. Great moments where the script flips the tropes on their heads, especially those of toxic masculinity and ignorance.
Score: 0.5
Characters
George is a lovable idiot with a better understanding of how to respect others then the rest of the characters.
Ursula was the stand in for the every man-character and bland because of it. The rest were a mixture of tropes and silliness.
Score: 0.5
Dialogue
The dialogue in this, specifically the narrator, makes me laugh every time. Despite the silliness, the movie does a great job at not overdoing the dialogue. It’s not perfect but it’s certainly quotable.
Score: 0.5
Visuals and Music
The visuals were okay. Scenery was pretty and the special effects held up well.
The music was so 1990’s it hurt. Even the theme song was a punk rock late 1990’s cover.
There was nothing special here but nothing terrible.
Score: 0.5
Fun
I have fond memories of this movie as a kid. Brendan Fraser is charming (as always) and the movie still has some of my favourite gags, but also has a lot more crotch punch and fart jokes then I remembered.
Score: 0.5
Overall
This is a fun movie, not great, not terrible but definitely fun. It has less awkward sexism or racism than a lot of movies from it’s time, and even has some good feminist messages.
